Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 86.5 38% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 149 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Clevo(1558 240C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 3.4 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 0.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Walton WS1256 256GB SSD 25 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 282 42 339 150 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 337 Write 302 Mixed 284 SusWrite 224 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 32.9 110% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 170 145% 209 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	75	23.7"	1280 720	XMI23C3 Redmi Monitor

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	5x

SSD
WS1256 256GB SSDWaltonBench 82%, 25 samples	2x
S800 240GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,330 samples	1x
2280 128GBNt-128Bench 76%, 9 samples	1x

RAM
WT-S4G2400H 1x4GBUnknownBench 34%, 53 samples	2x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
AID48G24C16SOD 1x8GBUnknownBench 18%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16