Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 16:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 210
2-Core 416
122% 235 Pts
4-Core 780
8-Core 1,307
127% 1,044 Pts
64-Core 1,933
120% 1,933 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Gigabyte(1458 2413) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 270
Parallax 545
216% 360 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 290
Splatting 282
240% 295 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 51 47 56 60 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
735GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 29 36 24 16 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 53.9
158% 55.1 GB/s
SC Read 52.4
SC Write 59.8
SC Mixed 54.5
159% 55.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 154%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 23% 53 213 58 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23C4 ASUS VC239
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,055
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback