Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 16:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 214
2-Core 424
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,442
135% 1,125 Pts
64-Core 2,996
185% 2,996 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 165
Parallax 183
155% 179 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 156
Splatting 109
135% 174 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 139%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 1090 1146 967 337 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 1,104
Mixed 803
SusWrite 829
211% 938 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 33.2
128% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 494
427% 628 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 161%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 30.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 5R 2G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 36% 50 193 26 165 16" 1707 996 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback