Lenovo 4518AZ5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
27 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemLenovo 4518AZ5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 16:28
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 178
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 344
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 87.7
53% 72.3 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 47.4
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 244
Mixed 170
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 13.7
25% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 15.8
52% 109 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Marshal MAL2750SA-T54 750GB
27GB free
Firmware: GQ108B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 48.2
30% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 7% 14 203 56 60 18.9" 1280 720 DELA03D DELL 1909W
Typical 4518AZ5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4518AZ5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback