Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 14 '24 at 16:13
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 60.1 36% 53 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 213 24% 190 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q) 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Device(1A58 1001) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.3% Below average	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 53.5 Parallax 42.4 38% 47.5 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 42 Splatting 42 33% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 40%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,592 Write 437 Mixed 1,113 230% 1,048 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 62.7 212% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 752 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 334 287% 438 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 10,173 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 464GB free Firmware: 0004 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 90.8 Write 31.4 Mixed 65.4 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 26.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 19.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	191	52	60	27"	1280 720	ACR071A CB272

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	265x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	143x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	257x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16