HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 1,023
93% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Gigabyte(1458 4131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.32
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 70.4
61% 72.7 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 55.6
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,344
Write 854
Mixed 439
193% 879 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 42.3
168% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 447
374% 534 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 180%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT32G4DFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback