Ibuypower INTEL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIbuypower INTEL  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z590-C/ac
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 339
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,164
109% 909 Pts
64-Core 1,599
99% 1,599 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 261
Reflection 246
Parallax 270
213% 259 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 229
Splatting 171
185% 234 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 183%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M371 1TB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM70.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,070
Write 1,527
Mixed 1,162
282% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 75
278% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 667
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 829
635% 847 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 301%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,728
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,938
444% 1,975 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 3.7
137% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 290
246% 355 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMGD480E82-3200D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 31.1
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 24.1" 1280 720 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical INTEL Builds (Compare 7,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

System: Ibuypower INTEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $919
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback