TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 161
2-Core 319
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 998
99% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Zotac(19DA 5527)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 83.2
75% 88.6 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 79
Splatting 72.7
71% 88.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 418 504 524 513 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,332
Write 1,239
Mixed 1,150
SusWrite 599
242% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.6
225% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 921
698% 947 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑
This bench: 202%
 Great: 300%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
711GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 158 157 157 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 150
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 156
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 94.4%
 Great: 106%
NORELSYS 1081CS1 250GB
214GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 74.7
Write 69.1
Mixed 28.7
69% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.4
174% 2.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 30.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 31.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 89.9%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1920 1009 LEN66B8 D27-30
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples720x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples337x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples259x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples287x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples173x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples153x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples68x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples66x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples65x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples138x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples118x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples99x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback