Oegstone B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Oegstone B85M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK B85M-E
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '24 at 15:15
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 182 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 267 36% 266 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX590 GME 1,573 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 94.8 57% 76.1 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 79.3 Splatting 48 51% 64.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB 4,724 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 421 Write 290 Mixed 241 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 35.6 118% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 148 116% 167 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 318GB free Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 89 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 73.5 Write 75.4 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 88 53% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 44GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 89 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 107 Write 105 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 90.9 67% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 0P 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	29%	17	189	17	60	21.5"	1920 1017	ACR0335 V226HQL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone B85M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	27x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	17x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	22x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	6x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	4x

RAM
99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 708 samples	8x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	5x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16