Lenovo 30HA000GUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive572% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemLenovo 30HA000GUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1066
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$292
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 212
2-Core 424
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 847
8-Core 1,562
144% 1,204 Pts
64-Core 2,511
155% 2,511 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Legend(17AA 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 94.5
Parallax 83.8
69% 87.5 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 75.6
68% 84.7 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X102N 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3592 3556 3539 3406 3384 3397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
572% Outstanding
Read 4,433
Write 2,748
Mixed 2,689
SusWrite 3,479
747% 3,337 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 111
361% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,768
DQ Write 1,346
DQ Mixed 1,546
1,159% 1,553 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 572%
Great: 562%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 50.3
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 24.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 137%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 23.8" 1280 720 VSE0001 VSEVEN
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback