Alienware m16 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive399% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TC7T8
Memory49.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240314
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 186
2-Core 335
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,058
100% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,767
109% 1,767 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0BFB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 13.1
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3029 3066 1833 1732 1689 1743 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,820
Write 3,454
Mixed 2,741
SusWrite 2,182
632% 2,799 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 100
329% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,105
833% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 399%
Great: 444%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB
433GB free
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3767 1771 1680 1543 1613 1663 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 4,304
Write 4,392
Mixed 3,101
SusWrite 2,006
774% 3,451 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 88.7
339% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,669
DQ Write 1,295
DQ Mixed 1393
1,066% 1,452 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 464%
Great: 666%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 52.7
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 136%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 165 34.2" 2752 1081 DELA216 AW3423DWF
Typical m16 R1 Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback