Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 13:58
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 416
56% 416 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 391 414 395 385 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 427
Mixed 412
SusWrite 385
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 266
222% 321 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2935 HP 2011
Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback