Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 12:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 467
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.3
7% 9.67 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 9.6
8% 10 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0242
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 99 145 200 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 281
Write 294
Mixed 324
SusWrite 142
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 11
81% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 57.7
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 120
111% 163 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
4TB free
Firmware: CC9C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 125 161 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 86
SusWrite 155
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 14 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIC13F Panasonic-TV
Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback