Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 12:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 471
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 40.3
35% 42.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.4
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 206 214 213 214 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 224
Write 211
Mixed 195
SusWrite 198
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 29.1
92% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 44.2
37% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 128%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
3TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 55.5
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 82.3
81% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA11D DELL P2419HC
Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback