Maxsun MS-Challenger B760M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMaxsun MS-Challenger B760M  (all builds)
MotherboardMAXSUN MS-Challenger B760M
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230105
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 282
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 935
89% 738 Pts
64-Core 1152
71% 1152 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3580 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 165
Parallax 110
103% 134 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 120
Splatting 106
100% 125 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 101%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,830
Write 3,224
Mixed 2,106
538% 2,387 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 84.9
321% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1329
978% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 10 240 27" 1280 720 ACR0A9E XZ273U X3
Typical MS-Challenger B760M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Maxsun MS-Challenger B760M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback