Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 11:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$253
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 187
2-Core 398
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1,510
137% 1,154 Pts
64-Core 1,867
116% 1,867 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 114%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.28
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 13.5
6% 11.9 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 22.2
13% 14.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M81000G 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2030 1668 1541 1264 1274 1215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,620
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 1,499
448% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.7
218% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,416
DQ Write 1,225
DQ Mixed 664
677% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 323%
Great: 374%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 49.8
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 46
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 49.3
143% 50 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 141%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 14 60 27.2" 2560 1369 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-B650M GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback