Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime16 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 11:13
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 177
2-Core 346
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1159
100% 855 Pts
64-Core 1566
97% 1566 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 190
Parallax 287
128% 211 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 186
Splatting 223
176% 215 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 136%
Great: 138%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 220 236 216 235 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 447
Mixed 367
SusWrite 250
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 51.6
171% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
278GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2194 2049 2187 2195 2200 2191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,584
Write 2,204
Mixed 1397
SusWrite 2,169
468% 2,089 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71.9
240% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1148
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 1020
771% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 357%
Great: 393%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
123GB free
Firmware: P9CR413
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,028
Write 4,109
Mixed 2531
654% 2,889 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 94.5
317% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 1,034
748% 976 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 441%
Seagate ST4000NM000A-2HZ100 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: TN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 199 203 199 201 200 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 191 189 187 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 159
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 189
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 218 216 218 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 36.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7715 LG HDR WFHD
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback