Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
27 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 09:35
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,098
100% 840 Pts
64-Core 2,759
171% 2,759 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Lighting 261
Reflection 254
Parallax 550
213% 355 fps
MRender 421
Gravity 215
Splatting 341
266% 326 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 205%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1654 1638 1421 1840 1677 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,475
Mixed 2,368
SusWrite 1,671
509% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 96.3
310% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1,030
776% 1,042 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 347%
Great: 435%
T-force 2TB 2TB
708GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 418 418 419 417 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 500
Write 420
Mixed 402
SusWrite 418
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 24.1
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 35
60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 105%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
24GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,483
Write 2,350
Mixed 2,255
528% 2,362 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 89.1
298% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 1,015
DQ Mixed 1,112
835% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
489GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 128 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 142
Mixed 20
SusWrite 127
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
460GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 147 147 143 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 101
Write 137
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 142
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
688GB free
Firmware: SPS6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 116 117 117 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 20.9
Write 116
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 115
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-16GTZN 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 43.4
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM7765 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback