HP ProBook 450 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837D
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 08:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 375
45% 349 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.3
4% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 177 196 195 187 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 376
Write 137
Mixed 225
SusWrite 188
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 14.1
60% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 166
137% 196 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 54%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC - [0x9B85] CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71EC
Typical ProBook 450 G5 Builds (Compare 1,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback