Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory118.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 07:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 752
71% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3102 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
601GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 408 430 429 437 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 451
Mixed 437
SusWrite 383
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 40.2
128% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 123
138% 236 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
468GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 306 320 323 328 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 364
Write 332
Mixed 316
SusWrite 290
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 36.7
121% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 99.2
96% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 1131 1210 1241 1282 1268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 1,284
Mixed 1,208
SusWrite 1,075
271% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 56.7
182% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 388
310% 446 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 193%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 40.1
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback