Alienware m17 R5 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m17 R5 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 059Y57
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 04:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 227
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 765
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Dell(1028 0B5B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.4% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 48.1
23% 39.8 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 25.7
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc801 NVMe SK hynix 1TB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 816 894 1273 1272 1272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,658
Write 1,291
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 1,062
297% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 48.3
135% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 664
436% 530 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 195%
Great: 504%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AEBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 42.1
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 29.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 123%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 480 17.2" 1920 1009 CMN1778
Typical m17 R5 AMD Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Alienware m17 R5 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback