HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AE
Memory31.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 04:55
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 101
45% 75 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 203
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84AE) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.5 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52046100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 386 347 395 397 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 389
Mixed 385
SusWrite 385
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 23.9
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 164
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD F4-3200C22-32GRS 39GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO70EC
Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback