bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 03:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 80
2-Core 157
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 353
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 62.5
53% 65.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 64.4
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52046100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 212 205 151 210 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 191
Write 209
Mixed 186
SusWrite 199
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 21.2
70% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 35.8
30% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 112%
WDC WD40EFPX-68C6CN0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 182 182 181 183 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 181
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.9
33% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 1.9
2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x435435313236344244313630422E43313646 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 GSM5A03 27EC33
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback