Asus PRIME B650M-A WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 321%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics286% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B650M-A WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory49.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 03:11
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 212
2-Core 423
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,555
142% 1,191 Pts
64-Core 3,712
230% 3,712 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$976
Palit(1569 F298) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
286% Outstanding
Lighting 431
Reflection 425
Parallax 496
351% 451 fps
MRender 496
Gravity 380
Splatting 250
293% 375 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 286%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,784
Write 3,630
Mixed 2,862
763% 3,425 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 69.2
252% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2,018
DQ Write 1,710
DQ Mixed 1,822
1,376% 1,850 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
69GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 316 313 314 314 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 467
SusWrite 337
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 55.1
186% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
24GB free
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 54 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 382
Write 162
Mixed 320
SusWrite 91.9
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 39.1
138% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 207
172% 244 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2955 2954 2956 2840 1714 1717 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,617
Write 3,059
Mixed 2,904
SusWrite 2,522
628% 2,776 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 82.1
275% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,948
DQ Write 1,708
DQ Mixed 1,823
1,368% 1,826 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 425%
Great: 477%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
520GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 172 170 134 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 136
Write 165
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 152
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
308% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 53.3
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 53.4
SC Write 64.7
SC Mixed 54.1
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 152%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7236 Odyssey G65B
Typical PRIME B650M-A WIFI II Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 216%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B650M-A WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback