Asus ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 00:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$253
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 190
2-Core 378
113% 216 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1,201
116% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,800
111% 1,800 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$774
Asus(1043 88E5) ≥ 4GB; ROG 4070 Ti
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 372
Reflection 351
Parallax 412
303% 378 fps
Gravity 306
Splatting 218
226% 262 fps
Poor: 208% Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3993 2740 1566 1652 2026 2097 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,977
Write 4,226
Mixed 3,199
SusWrite 2,346
721% 3,187 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 86
267% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,856
DQ Write 1,361
DQ Mixed 1,626
1,210% 1,614 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 417%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF564C32-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
179% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 67.7
185% 64.8 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 71.3
SC Mixed 59.6
173% 60.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 179%
Great: 228%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 144 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3202 AORUS FI32U
Typical ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 264%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 312%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback