User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 23:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 678
62% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,187
74% 1,187 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 37.2
30% 37.4 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 163 91 56 94 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 442
Write 431
Mixed 152
SusWrite 136
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 28.5
84% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 133
139% 228 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%
Xraydisk 256GB SSD 256GB
122GB free
Firmware: 705D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 182 191 190 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 430
Write 186
Mixed 247
SusWrite 190
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 10.5
86% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 14.1
65% 143 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2666U1908JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 43% 21 199 24 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0750 VG240Y S
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback