Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 62
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 111
43% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 342
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 91
52% 71.6 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 42.5
46% 58.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101Q 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN17003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 358 393 397 391 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 319
Write 352
Mixed 245
SusWrite 381
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 28
96% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 177
140% 191 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 64 54.8" 1280 720 SAM0B5C SAMSUNG
Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback