Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 341%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 335%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics328% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 22:16
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 99.1
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,108
105% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,538
95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
PNY(196E 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
328% Outstanding
Lighting 502
Reflection 556
Parallax 714
409% 591 fps
MRender 484
Gravity 524
Splatting 282
337% 430 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 328%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1372
Write 1,093
Mixed 1037
260% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 84.4
284% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1082
791% 1,027 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
74GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 487 487 419 493 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 490
Mixed 317
SusWrite 477
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 40.3
150% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 68.8
134% 267 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
290GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 80 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 82.3
Mixed 356
SusWrite 94.5
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58.1
198% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 117
141% 250 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
169GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 130 128 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 182
Write 181
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 129
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
186GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 127 127 125 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 85.3
Write 67.1
Mixed 56
SusWrite 126
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 42.3
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 41.3
97% 41.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 27" 2560 1377 ACI27A8 ASUS MG278
Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback