Asrock B450M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 22:09
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 341
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,291
117% 986 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 139
Parallax 176
75% 135 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 166
128% 156 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 448 243 42 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 508
Write 449
Mixed 421
SusWrite 282
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 26.4
109% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 50.6
101% 198 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
458GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 177 177 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 175
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
441GB free
Firmware: BD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 208
Write 23.6
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 105
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2756CS.001 Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Kingston 99U5702-114.A00G Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 38.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 BNQ8403 BenQ DL2215
Typical B450M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback