Asrock AB350M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 21:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 195
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 519
58% 455 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 34.5
20% 31.7 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 25.3
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 139 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 405
Write 166
Mixed 187
SusWrite 140
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 23.5
89% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 70.4
DQ Mixed 102
96% 155 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 29.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 60 21.5" 1920 1017 DELF069 DELL E2216H
Typical AB350M Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback