Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H-BK
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 20:37
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 610
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 190
Parallax 187
146% 185 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 185
Splatting 124
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN11SM19FS256ITNV 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318A0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 43 247 69 226 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 575
Write 533
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 137
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 14
87% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 18.6
88% 201 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 188%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
88GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 93.4
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 86.9
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52%
Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 90 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 40.9
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 90.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 104%
OOS1000G 1TB
509GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 133 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 118
Write 83.3
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 135
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
26GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 89.6
Mixed 102
131% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.1
272% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-BK-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback