MSI MS-7369

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMSI MS-7369  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090317
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 20:03
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 42.7
25% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 64.2
8-Core 65.9
9% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 64.7
4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2883) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 77.1
50% 69.6 fps
MRender 80.9
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 60.6
57% 71.3 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 46 51 55 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 143
Write 143
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 49.7
69% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 51 53 57 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 75
Write 43.5
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 52.4
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F91 LC24RG50
Typical MS-7369 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback