Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 17:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 822
84% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Asus(1043 04E6) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 116
55% 83.8 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 40.8
45% 57.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 148 149 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 494
Mixed 386
SusWrite 180
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59.7
208% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 356
272% 367 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
931GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 239 240 239 235 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 458
Write 408
Mixed 322
SusWrite 250
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 16.4
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 33.3
46% 84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 58%
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B4S8JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 261 259 260 261 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,755
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,251
SusWrite 296
298% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 92.1
324% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 465
465% 738 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 267%
Great: 279%
Inateck FE202x Series 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 410 410 410 409 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 227
Write 411
Mixed 267
SusWrite 398
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 37.5
126% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 251
168% 201 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 34.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 21% 56 212 57 60 31.5" 1920 1017 ITE6662 iTE-Compose
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback