bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardVMware, VBSA
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2408 x 1498 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Apple Part 000 r0p0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 69.8
33% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 190
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0406) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.6.5
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 476
52% 198 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 38.9
29% 35 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 173GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,509
Write 2,504
Mixed 2,556
564% 2,523 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 29.5
100% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 248
190% 258 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 93.1
MC Write 67
MC Mixed 77
226% 79 GB/s
SC Read 38.9
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 41.8
106% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 198%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback