Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 16:57
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 182
2-Core 360
113% 212 Pts
4-Core 704
8-Core 1,391
124% 1,048 Pts
64-Core 2,799
173% 2,799 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 308
Parallax 335
258% 320 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 258
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 214%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,933
Write 2,552
Mixed 2,360
582% 2,615 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 89.1
290% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1270
959% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
419GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,853
Write 3,119
Mixed 2,910
663% 2,961 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 88.1
286% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,351
1,018% 1,367 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M16FE1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.8
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 42.1
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 129%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback