Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 16 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 16:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$278
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 382
109% 212 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,165
107% 896 Pts
64-Core 1,724
107% 1,724 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
PowerColor(148C 2427) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 244
Parallax 466
189% 314 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 259
Splatting 238
216% 269 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 179%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NQ790 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN16486
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3461 3376 3469 3494 2048 1745 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 3,373
Write 2,566
Mixed 2,702
SusWrite 2,932
650% 2,893 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 71.9
233% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,066
DQ Write 1,440
DQ Mixed 1,516
1,196% 1,674 MB/s
Poor: 276%
This bench: 464%
Great: 572%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 61
MC Mixed 62.8
171% 60 GB/s
SC Read 52.9
SC Write 64.9
SC Mixed 55.6
165% 57.8 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 165%
This bench: 167%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2703 Q27G3G3R3
Typical GA-B650M GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback