Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 15:56
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 825
77% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 110
Parallax 99.9
129% 123 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 92.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 495 723 583 439 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 252
Write 312
Mixed 475
SusWrite 443
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 40.2
141% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 645
455% 574 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 223%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
96GB free
Firmware: V8X04c26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 204 209 212 210 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 396
Write 356
Mixed 340
SusWrite 206
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 29.1
99% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 178
136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
2GB free
Firmware: AX002F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.6
Write 60.9
Mixed 28.8
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
199GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 104 100 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 108
Write 71.6
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 103
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 33.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 50 165 27" 1280 720 SGT2700 PG-CRPLS27-BL
Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback