MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive373% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 15:51
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 178
2-Core 354
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,260
117% 975 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3768 1972 2043 2069 2174 2176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 4,194
Mixed 3,280
SusWrite 2,367
694% 3,053 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 87.5
281% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,185
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 1,013
764% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 373%
Great: 521%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
649GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 1215 1208 1205 1197 1281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,370
Write 1483
Mixed 1,543
SusWrite 1,205
368% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 65.1
217% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,097
832% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 286%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
189GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 454 454 453 452 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 419
Mixed 445
SusWrite 410
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 277
232% 336 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 209 211 204 213 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 135
Write 158
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 208
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 106%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
140GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 1.1 0.5 7.5 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 94.4
Write 60.6
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 4.3
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA114 DELL P2219H
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback