Asus X556UQK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X556UQK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556UQK
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 15:39
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 123
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 187
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.03 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 12.5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 126 122 55 69 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 452
Write 345
Mixed 345
SusWrite 114
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 15.6
92% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 35.8
74% 144 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE066E
Typical X556UQK Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556UQK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback