Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220115
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 68
38% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 135
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 12
8% 9.6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.7
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 81 90 91 85 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 311
Write 159
Mixed 156
SusWrite 94.1
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 11.3
47% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 136
106% 151 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 3.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 0.3
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 455
9% 455 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08D5
Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback