bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard KLX99
Memory52.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:49
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 126
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 459
40% 340 Pts
64-Core 1,335
83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 39.3
33% 41 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 145 236 385 152 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 196
241% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 42.6
138% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 564
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 322
270% 397 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 119%
Great: 305%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 997 969 645 271 271 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,066
Write 931
Mixed 960
SusWrite 570
198% 882 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 43.3
143% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 588
424% 554 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 146%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 31.9
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 19
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN36AC HP V24i
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback