Tongfang GM7PX9N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 255%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 315%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics227% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemTongfang GM7PX9N  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7PX9N
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 827
8-Core 1,522
140% 1,175 Pts
64-Core 3,232
200% 3,232 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 126B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
227% Outstanding
Lighting 322
Reflection 346
Parallax 402
262% 356 fps
MRender 460
Gravity 297
Splatting 215
252% 324 fps
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 244%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO NH 2TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM51.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2400 2421 1410 1119 1100 1115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,366
Write 2,434
Mixed 2,230
SusWrite 1594
485% 2,156 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 64.5
200% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 909
616% 764 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 286%
Great: 576%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548S38-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 60.9
MC Mixed 58.3
173% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 26.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 155%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 17" 1707 996 BOE0A99
Typical GM7PX9N Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO

System: Tongfang GM7PX9N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 247% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback