MSI B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D99)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D99
MotherboardMSI B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D99)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240321
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 203
2-Core 399
116% 226 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1380
129% 1,075 Pts
64-Core 2,254
140% 2,254 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
MSI(1462 7D99) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 15
Parallax 11
8% 12 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 0.4
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 1TB
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A230W3UA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1308 1170 1205 1250 1254 1259 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 3,776
Write 4,516
Mixed 2,661
SusWrite 1241
684% 3,048 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 103
359% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,499
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,254
930% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 393%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-BLARW 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 75 23.9" 1280 720 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D99) Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7D99)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback