Lenovo 80XL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80XL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime23.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:13
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 123
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 38E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.81% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 10.9
10% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 9.3
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 98 122 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 357
Write 123
Mixed 148
SusWrite 119
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 15.5
87% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 117
117% 194 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
913GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 131 134 134 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 131
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D5
Typical 80XL Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback