Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	May 13 '24 at 13:02
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4900-$42 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 38.5 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 94 40% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 132 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 3.6 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 6 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 42 26 43 45 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 221 Write 148 Mixed 165 SusWrite 62.6 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 9.9 35% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 95.3 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 72.3 57% 80 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 241 17% 241 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	32	60	18.5"	1280 720	PHLC0CD PHL 193V5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	398x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	381x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	297x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	195x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	129x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	167x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	68x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	44x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16