HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 12:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 725
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.6% Good
Lighting 79.4
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 82.6
65% 84.3 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 94.3
73% 88.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0TBN-1AR1ZABHA 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 369 420 371 371 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 410
Write 432
Mixed 365
SusWrite 362
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 28.4
107% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 335
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.3% Good
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 18.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 10.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 9 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN3481 HP Z24i G2
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback