Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120719
Uptime30.7 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 12:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31275
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 180
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 448
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B E178) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 19.4
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 16
Splatting 11.9
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 306 284 269 251 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 338
Mixed 378
SusWrite 274
102% 465 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25.5
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 281
212% 286 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 24" 1280 720 SAM04D4 SyncMaster
Typical CELSIUS W510 POWER Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback