HP Z2 Tower G9 Workstation Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive433% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z2 Tower G9 Workstation Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 895C
Memory37.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 12:07
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$462
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 241
2-Core 471
135% 264 Pts
4-Core 920
8-Core 1,771
160% 1,346 Pts
64-Core 3,823
237% 3,823 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
HP(103C 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 85.6
70% 89.3 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 78.6
71% 88.5 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2489 3059 3127 2309 1624 1628 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 3,083
Mixed 2701
SusWrite 2,373
605% 2,678 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 102
335% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 2,113
DQ Mixed 700
850% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 433%
Great: 431%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPS4NGXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2789 2923 2927 2904 2304 1511 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2,852
Mixed 2,557
SusWrite 2,560
587% 2,593 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 76.2
245% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 2358
DQ Mixed 990
920% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 398%
Great: 476%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 57
166% 58.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 53.8
SC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 152%
Great: 190%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 10 60 23" 1920 1017 HPN3685 HP E23 G4
Typical Z2 Tower G9 Workstation Desktop PC Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

System: HP Z2 Tower G9 Workstation Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback