Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q556/2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q556/2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3403-U1
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 10:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 146
58% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 281
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 290 337 336 280 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 410
Write 379
Mixed 238
SusWrite 313
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 24.7
77% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 51.2
44% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23" 1280 720 AOC2369 2369M
Typical ESPRIMO Q556/2 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q556/2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback