Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 09:09
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 757
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 65.4
54% 68 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 63.9
53% 65 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1333 533 470 433 541 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2013
Write 1,767
Mixed 1,670
SusWrite 629
340% 1,520 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 63.1
213% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 728
544% 728 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 217%
Great: 300%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 464 465 469 466 469 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 442
SusWrite 462
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 44.5
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 587 600 592 592 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 657
Write 582
Mixed 604
SusWrite 602
138% 611 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 69.7
225% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 727
DQ Mixed 782
584% 776 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 168%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 216 215 218 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback